Regimental
Dispatch
January 2002 Sic Semper Tyrranus Richmond, VA
Commanders ColumnIt is good to have this time off. I know I am enjoying the respite. Oh, I forgot, there is no rest for the weary. It is nice to have more time than usual.
Camp of Instruction
The COI is going to happen, on the range and
dates we requested. We have been contacted
about the logistics for the COI, however we are still waiting for the official letter
stating we have it. I will be contacting
those vendors that provided the wood (just for Joe) and straw again to be ready for us. I always look forward to the COI, I really enjoy
this event almost more than any other event we attend.
Make a note of the date and plan to attend. We
will be on Range #18 Multi Purpose again. The
range has a good vehicle park that is out of sight from the main training area; a good
tree-covered bivouac site directly adjacent to range area for all of our firing and drill
programs; and an excellent wooded skirmish area for training. Now is the time for you to
talk that "friend" into coming to this event to see if he wants to take up this
hobby. The company will assist with a musket, equipment, etc., so talk it up! Tentage will
be available again this year. There will be more to follow in upcoming newsletters.
Newsletter
Editor Needed, Still!!!
Due to the overwhelming response to being the newsletter editor, I am taking my time
selecting from the huge pile of resumes that are interested in performing this task. All right, I am done with the satire, you all get
the picture.
Annual Meeting Info
Events?
The following is
revised tentative list of events for the 2002 reenactment year. I am giving you this list before the annual
meeting so we can have a more lively discussion during the meeting and so you can plan
ahead to be at these events.
COI
22-24 March
Saylers Creek
6-7 April
Rich CW Days
27 April
Fort
Pocahontas
18-19 May
Cold Harbor
1-2 June
140th 7 Days Battles
27-30 June
140th Sharpsburg
13-15
Sept
Explorer Park (fund raiser $500) Oct
Cedar Creek
Oct
Ft. Branch
Nov
Nov CW Show
?16-17 Nov?
F Co Annual Soriee
?16 Nov
If you have anything you want considered you
need to get me the write-up about it for the next newsletter ASAP, or at least prior to 25
Jan. 2002!!! Send me the website link and an
explanation of why you thing F Company should go. Then
it can be published on the signup sheet that everyone will receive prior to the meeting so
that we can make a final decision at the meeting on the events. There will be a slight change in how many events
we do this upcoming season. The Executive
Committee has decided that the Company is going for quality events with a very high
percentage of members in attendance. We will
not be put into the position of having to fall in with other groups due to the lack of
members, again. Dont get me wrong, we
appreciate our brother units in the SWB and JD, letting our members fall in but there is
just something about falling in with your own company.
This change in the number of events means there will be less then that of
previous years. This will give everyone fewer
events on the schedule, so that hopefully, we can maximize our membership attendance at
events. This strategy has been implemented to
avoid the problems of last year, lots of events with little or no attendance. The Executive Committee and I have learned our
lesson that the members are voting with their feet, that we had too many events last year. Therefore, we are going to try fewer events. The schedule will be solely determined from the
annual meeting. Everyone will be expected to
vote for events they want to attend, not what they think the company should attend. If you are unable to attend the meeting you need
to send your signup sheet to the PO Box ASAP. The
top 6 or 7 will be the schedule. A new signup
sheet will be gleaned from this democratic process and that will be set as the schedule
and mailed, and should be returned as your final sign up sheet. This means that events you vote for may or may not
be on the final schedule. The Executive
Committee only asks that you do your final selection of events from the final schedule. The COI is a fore gone conclusion and will not be
counted in the voting. The COI and the Annual
Meeting are required for the Company to exist in its current stateas it is determined by
the By-laws and policies in place. If you
have a better idea of how to bring attendance up at events, please bring it to the annual
meeting with some plan for making it work. Ideas
without execution are just passing thoughts that are lost.
New Baby News
From Mr.
Coursons email with minor changes
December 3, 2001 around 12:30, Mr. and
Mrs. Ward delivered their new baby son, weighing in at 7 pounds, 8 ounces. Both mother and
baby are doing fine. Mr. Ward, on the other hand, is doing great!
Grand
Baby News
From Mrs.
Vices email with minor changes
I am so pleased to
announce a new addition to our family. A
granddaughter was born to my daughter and her husband last night on Dec.13, 2002. Weighing in at 7 ¼. Mother and daughter are doing fine. Father who watched was a little shaky. We
are so excited.
Muzzi and
PePa
Capt. Jones
First Sergeants Report
I have been working
hard to develop a much better and challenging layout for the bayonet exercise at the Camp
of Instruction. I hope everyone will enjoy
this part of the Camp of Instruction more than last year.
For those of you who
need hand dipped candles or a new shirt please give me a call or e-mail me and let me know
what you want. This is the perfect time to
get those needed items over the layoff. Also,
if you need other items to complete your impression get on them now so you will have them
by next season. I still have material and
buttons left for one battleshirt. The problem
is that you will need to get someone to sew it up. If
you are interested get your money to Jack, payable to F Company, and I will deliver the
material.
Have a great holiday season and I will see
you soon.
1st Sgt. Wilson
1st Lt.s Report
I hope everyone is enjoying the Holiday
Season. With all its hustle and bustle,
please take time to remember the true meaning of Christmas.
As things begin to calm down, keep in mind
that the annual meeting will be here before you know it.
It is February 23rd. Make
plans to attend. This is where you get to put
your two cents worth in and elect officers and help determine the schedule for the year.
Also, now is a good time to take inventory of
your uniform and equipment to see what needs to be repaired and/or replaced. Dont wait to the last minute to make those
needed adjustments.
Enjoy the month off and I will see you in
February.
1st. Lt. Turley
Slinging It Around
By
R. W. Gregory
Several months ago while looking through a
reenactors Internet discussion board the subject of rifle slings came up. After some
questions as who made a good reproduction; the talk wandered to the subject of did they
did they or did they not have rifle slings? The consensus was that the soldiers probably
considered them generally useless and extra weight and probably threw them away. There
were some citations of unit records that recorded the issue of muskets of various types
and only a few rifle slings.
First we have to consider what a rifle sling
is used for. One purpose of the sling is to provide a means of attaining a steady firing
platform for offhand firing. There is no mention of using the sling for this purpose in
any U.S. manual until the First World War. So what was the sling designed for?
Of course the sling must have been designed
so we can conveniently carry our musket on a long march. No not really. A search through
various American drill and tactics manuals of period; such as Scotts[1],
Hardees[2],
Gilhams[3]
and Caseys[4]
make no mention of the use of a sling for any purpose.
U.S. manuals do make provision for an
alternative means carrying of the musket. Right Shoulder Shift, and Trail Arms were
designed to provide a means of carrying the musket besides the position of Shoulder Arms.
When we get to the command of Route
Step. It was assumed that the soldier could carry the musket in a more comfortable
position, but none of these manuals mentions using the sling as a means of carrying the
musket while marching. The manuals merely specify that the soldier was to carry his musket
so that the muzzle remained upright.
The first manual for which I can find mention
of the use of the sling on a march is a foreign manual. Captain Barbers Instructions For The Formation and Exercise of
Volunteer Sharp-Shooters[5]
(1804 edition) was the basic manual that was used to train the embryonic rifle regiments
(60th and 95th ) of the British Army of the Napoleonic Wars. In the
manual of arms For Riflemen; Barber
details the position of sling arms. In this movement the rifle was brought across the body
in a port arms position; the left elbow was inserted in the sling, and then the rifle butt
was brought upwards and the muzzle was placed in a downward position. The left hand would
be used to steady the musket.
This position is carried forward in later
editions of Her Majesties Drill Instruction. It is plainly apparent that this is
authorized only for Riflemen armed with the Baker rifle and 1859 two banded musket. This
could be the origin of the oft-stated reenactorism that Enfield muskets are carried with
the rifle butt upwards.
Egbert L. Vieles (No I am not kidding),
Handbook For Active Service Containing Practical Instructions In Campaign Duties;
contains the advice that once Route Step has been given
The soldiers now carry
their arms in any manner most convenient. Some sling them over their shoulder, (most of
them prefer this as least fatiguing.)[6]
If this is the only reference we can find to
the use of carrying the rifle by the sling; we can infer that it must not have been a
primary purpose. So what was the purpose of the sling?
The true purpose of the sling was to provide
a means for the soldier to keep his weapon close at hand while performing some duty that
required the use of his hands. For example; soldiers might be required to carry some
ammunition boxes forward. The rifle would then be slung across the back. In situations
where they were in close proximity to the enemy, soldiers would not stack arms nor would
they ground arms.
A definite example of this is in the pre-war
Regiment of Mounted Rifles and the 2nd Dragoons. Soldiers of the mounted rifles
were issued the 1855 Rifle[7].
There was no provision on the horse equipment for the carrying of the rifle. Therefore
these troops were required to carry their muskets slung across their backs as they rode.
The situation was the same for the 2nd Dragoons who were issued 1841
Mississippi rifles[8].
One of the responsibilities of U.S. Marines
stationed aboard ships was to man the fighting tops. They would sling their muskets across
their backs while making their way to their assigned posts in the ships rigging.
Engravings of the fighting in Mexico show U.
S. troops climbing ladders during the assault on Chapaultepec with muskets slung across
their backs. While other troops were assaulting the walls; soldiers of the 7th
Infantry slung their muskets on their backs while they battered down the gates to the
fortress
Were slings available for issue? Yes.
How were they available? Items of equipment such as tents, buckets, axes,
clothing and such were the responsibility of the Quartermaster Department. Gun slings were
not considered normal equipage. Instead they were considered an item of ordnance. The
rifle sling was one item of several that made up a set of accoutrements. A complete set of
accoutrements was comprised of; 1 Cartridge box, 1 Cartridge box plate, 1 Waist belt, 1
Waist belt plate, 1 Bayonet scabbard and Frog, 1 Cap pouch & Cone pick, and 1 Gun
sling.
During the war, the U.S. Government purchased
just from contractors alone over 2 million, 100 thousand complete sets of accoutrements.[9]
This number does not take into account complete sets made at several arsenals or the tens
of thousands of complete sets of accoutrements purchased by various states who issued them
to their own troops.
Therefore it should be safe to state that on
the Federal side at least gun slings were readily available.
On the Confederate side gun slings were also
available in large quantities. As part of the 1808 Militia Act; the Adjutant Generals of
states were authorized to draw from national stores a certain amount of muskets being held
in storage at arsenals such as Harpers Ferry or at Springfield Massachusetts. As an option
the adjutant generals could instead draw on sets of accoutrements which many of them took
advantage of.
Prior to the war, many of the southern states
entered in contracts with private contractors to provide full sets of accoutrements. With
the outbreak of war and as the Confederate Ordnance Department got organized, supplies
began to pour out of depots such as Richmond and Atlanta. In a letter to the Secretary of
War dated 7 Jan 1863, Josiah Gorgas reported that the Ordnance Bureau had to date issued
over 282, 000 complete sets of accoutrements, with another 25,000 in reserve.[10]
The cargo manifest of the blockade-runner
Leopard in June 1862 lists among the items 4 cases of gun slings. Cargo manifests of other
blockade-runners list cases of gun slings as well.[11] On 8 Feb 1863, Josiah Gorgas reported that 40,240
gun slings had been purchased by Caleb Huse and had been shipped to Southern ports.[12]
So it should be clear that rifle slings were
also readily available to Confederates as well.
Lets discuss slings that would have
been available for our two main types of weapons.
Enfield. Prior To the war, Enfield
muskets depending on the lot size could be purchased for $14.23 a piece. Each
Enfield was supplied with a standard British Army sling. The British sling was one of two
types: a white buff leather type sling issued to Guards and regular regiments, and a black
leather sling issued to Rifle regiments. It
was made from bridle leather, 48" long and 1 1/4" wide.[13]
The sling was finished only on the inside. A
leather thong attached the sling to the lower swivel. The sling could have a loop or a
small brass buckle at the other end.
Federal. The US regulation sling was a leather strap, 46 " long and
1 1/4" wide, with a captive loop at one end, a brass hook at the other, and a sliding
keeper between The leather specified was "russet bag leather", which was a brown
color, lighter weight leather.[14]
Cloth slings were
introduced in an effort to save leather. Linen and canvas were the two most common types.
The cloth would be folded over and sewn to add strength to the material. Small leather
tabs would be sewn on the ends to help reduce wear on the slings. The dimensions were the
same as the standard Federal sling. These slings proved less durable than their leather
counterparts and the need for frequent replacement actually made them less practical.
Now lets get to the subject of whether
they had slings on their muskets or not. Did soldiers in the Civil War have slings on
their muskets? To find out if they were carrying them I looked at pictures. Specifically I
looked at pictures of troops in the field. I did not look at studio photos for the
following reasons.
First, there is the good possibility that the
weapon being held is a studio prop and not the actual weapon issued to that soldier.
Secondly I believe it was highly unlikely that soldiers would be allowed out of camp with
their weapons. Provosts in cities such as Norfolk and Richmond were having enough problems
with drunken soldiers much less with armed men wandering around town.
Photos of Confederate units in the field are
rare in comparison to photos of Federal units. However, careful study of the photos I did
find was revealing. It did not matter what weapon the unit was armed with as the vast
majority had slings attached to their weapons.
Photos of the Clinch River Rifles revealed
slings attached to their 1841 Mississippi rifles. A
photograph of Louisiana Zouaves clearly showed slings on the 1842 muskets.
Photographs of the 9th Mississippi
stationed in Pensacola did not show any slings on the few muskets that could be seen;
however, a careful examination of the photo did not show any large quantities of muskets
in the background. It is a possibility that muskets might not have been issued in any
quantity at the time the picture was taken.
I examined photos of pre war Southern militia
units on the theory that it is most likely that these were the weapons they would have
went to war with and they showed a preponderance of the units had slings attached.
Photos of Federals were even more revealing.
Almost every photo I saw had slings on the muskets.
It is clear from supply records and
photographic documentation that most Confederates had slings for their rifles. From the
evidence supplied above you should equip your musket with a sling.
If you are carrying an Enfield; consider
getting a British sling for your musket. A word of warning though, measure your sling
swivels as the reproduction sling swivels are too narrow. ( as part of my defarbing I
replaced my sling swivels with originals I picked up at a gun show for a couple of
dollars.) Consult the uniform committee for a recommended source. For a Springfield
definitely get yourself a regulation Federal sling. Again
check with the uniform committee for a source.
When the command is given to Route
Step consider how you are going to carry your musket. For a more authentic
appearance consider keeping that sling off your shoulder and instead carry your musket at
the shoulder or at trail arms.
Authors note: I would like to
thank Mr. Dell Ballo and Mr. Abholt who graciously provided information used in the
preparation of this article.
[1]Winfield
Scott, Infantry Tactics or Rules for the Exercise and Maneuvers of the United States
Infantry Volume 1, New York 1835 edition, reprinted by Steve Abholt 1990 Texas
[2]William J. Hardee, Rifle and Light Infantry Tactics Vol. 1. Reprint Green wood Press Publisher Westport CT 1971
[3] William Gilham , Manual of Instruction for Volunteers and Militia of Confederate States, , West and Johnston Publishers, Richmond VA 1861
[4] Silas Casey, Infantry Tactics for the Instruction, Exercise and Manoeuveres. Vol. 1. Reprint Morningside Press Dayton, OH 1985
[5] Barber, Captain, Instructions For the Formation and Exercise of Volunteer Sharpshooters, T. Egerton, Military Library, London 1804
[6]Egbert L. Viele, Handbook For Active Service. Containing Practical Instruction In Campaign Duties, for the Use of Volunteers. , D. Van Norstand, New York; 1861
[7] William P. Todd, Military Equipage Volume 1, Chatham Press New York, 1985
[8] John Langellier, U.S. Dragoons 1833-1855, Osprey Men At Arms 281 Osprey Publications 1995
[9]Paul D. Johnson, Civil War Cartridge Boxes of the Union Infantryman, , Andrew Mowbray Publishers, Lincoln RI 1998
[10] Official Records, Series IV, Vol. 2 Reprint National Historical Society, Harrisburg PA 1985
[11] Wiley Sword, Firepower From Abroad, Men At Arms Monograph Series No. 2, Andrew Mowbray Publishers Linconln RI 1986
[12] Official Records, Series IV, Vol. 2 Reprint National Historical Society, Harrisburg PA 1985
[13] Arms and Equipment of the British Army, 1866, Victorian Military Equipment from the Enfield to the Snider edited by John Watler Greenhill Books London England 1986
[14] U.S. Ordnance Manual 1860 edition